@Pirate Praveen I have reviewed the writeup and added my changes in this pad https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/2/pad/edit/vo6U8Fg1iMGl-tn9qVSV0vL+/.

I think the question "How do you plan to coordinate feature prioritization and development across the different Debian-based mobile distros?" isn't answered (or I overlooked). Maybe you can write one sentence about your experience of fundraising similar projects on Open Collective.

@Ravi Dwivedi we can add "We will try to implement features in upstream projects whenever possible so all distributions will eventually gets it".

Maybe we can organize our write-up in question-answer format.

@Ravi Dwivedi yes

Thanks to Ravi, Akhil and Contrapunctus for the review. I have replied in opencollective.

Thanks for your response.

Before we move forward with accepting your community, I have one quick request: would you be open to revising your account name? I’m bringing this up not to be nitpicky, but because I want to help prevent potential issues down the line Let me explain. 

Right now, “Fund Phosh on Debian for Mobile” feels more like a campaign or call to action than the name of a collective or working group. To avoid any confusion, especially around whether this effort is officially tied to the Phosh or Debian projects, we’d recommend something a bit less campaign-focused and more reflective of the community behind the work. Something even like “Phosh on Debian for Mobile Community Group” or “ - User Group” (or something a bit catchier than those examples!) could work well. 

If you decide on a noun vs verb name, you can always get more specific about the actual campaign on your Open Collective page, especially by creating Projects to highlight a particular goal.

As a fiscal host, it’s  important to us that it’s clear we’re not funding official project development or speaking on behalf of those maintainers. A more neutral name will help avoid misunderstandings and make it clearer we’re not stepping on the toes of other organizations that may already be supporting the official projects. Another perk of having a neutral name is if you need to enter into any type of agreement or contract, which would help avoid legal confusion. Let us know your thoughts.

We need to find a new name for the collective.

PhoMo: a community of people dedicated to daily driving mobile gnu/linux without "missing out" on stability and usability. (Adding gnu/linux as in Debian). Suggested by earboxer on XMPP/Matrix group.

@Badri Sunderarajan there is another collective by the name Phomo! So we need to add some more (special) characters or go with second choice (dephcom is not taken). May be another poll? Pho-Mo vs Pho_Mo vs Phomos vs PhosMo vs PhomoFund vs Dephcom

@Pirate Praveen how about "Debian PhoMo Community"? We are Debian users who have FOMO about missing out on functional phones/mobiles so we are working on improving Phosh on Mobile support.

The URL could be DebPhoMo (or debphomo if it has to be lowercase)

This would solve the issue of reopening the discussion on which platforms to support. My only concern is that it might be confused with the existing PhoMo collective, although we are quite different from a quiz app.

On consideration, maybe DebPhoMo as the name itself is even better. There's no scope for confusion with Phomo, and we still get to do the PhoMo wordplay. Additionally, we immediately indicate our connection to Debian so if people want to know what our focus is it's all in the title.

However, I'm open to other suggestions too. I'd like to know what others think about "fixing" this top name vs. going with the second or third option instead (although personally I agree with DEPHCOM sounding a bit militaristic)

I have renamed our collective to opencollective.com/dephcom and applied again to Open Source Collective as fiscal host.

Our collective is live! We can now proceed to setting up bounties for the items identified as top priorities in the last poll.