Constitution amendment: clarify initial membership
Update article 3, section 2. Add subsection 5.
Initial members were accepted only for first 6 months.
Add subsection 6:
After 6 months of initial membership, they become an associate.
Add this as a slide at the end:
History:
- First batch of initial members of Indian Pirates were initial members of Pirate Movement of India.
- Pirate Movement of India was abandoned since no initial member requested permanent membership after 6 months.
- Initial members joined after first batch of Initial members from Pirate Movement of India had their membership valid for some more time after new initial memberships were closed.
- They approved permanent members before their term of 6 months expired, from initial members and associates who completed 6 months by then (those who joined before them).
Poll Created Mon 16 May 2016 11:13AM
Constitution amendment: clarify initial member concept Closed Mon 23 May 2016 11:02AM
Passed
Update article 3, section 2. Add subsection 5.
Initial members were accepted only for first 6 months.
Add subsection 6:
After 6 months of initial membership, they become an associate.
Add this as a slide at the end as appendix 2 (mark the pirate label as appendix 1):
History:
First batch of initial members of Indian Pirates were initial members of Pirate Movement of India.
Pirate Movement of India was abandoned since no initial member requested permanent membership after 6 months.
Initial members joined after first batch of Initial members from Pirate Movement of India had their membership valid for some more time after new initial memberships were closed.
They approved permanent members before their term of 6 months expired, from initial members and associates who completed 6 months by then (those who joined before them).
Update Article 3, section 2 by adding "No longer applicable/see history at appendix 2"
Results
Results | Option | % of points | Voters | |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Agree | 100.0% | 1 | |
Abstain | 0.0% | 0 | ||
Disagree | 0.0% | 0 | ||
Block | 0.0% | 0 | ||
Undecided | 0% | 7 |
1 of 8 people have participated (12%)
Pirate Praveen
Mon 16 May 2016 11:13AM
This removes confusion
Pirate Praveen Mon 16 May 2016 11:04AM
@balasankarchelamat sounds good, I'll update the proposal.
Balasankar C · Mon 16 May 2016 8:31AM
Also add a paranthesis to the main slide's title saying "No longer relevant/applicable/available/" and link to the last slide like @praveenarimbrathod said.